Modelling Under-Reported Data: Pitfalls of Na\"ive Approaches and a New Statistical Framework for Epidemic Curve Reconstruction
Abstract
Count-valued autoregressions are widely used to analyse time-series of reported infectious-disease cases because of their close connection with discrete-time transmission models. However, when such models are applied directly to under-reported case counts, their mechanistic interpretation can break down. We establish new theoretical results quantifying the consequences of ignoring under-reporting in these models. To address this issue, reported cases are often modelled as a binomially thinned version of an underlying count process, but such models are difficult to fit because the unobserved true counts are serially correlated and integer-valued. We develop a new statistical framework for under-reported infectious-disease data that uses a normal-normal approximation to a broad class of thinned count autoregressions and then accurately maps this continuous process back to the integers. Through simulations and applications to rotavirus incidence in a German state and Covid-19 incidence in English conurbations, we demonstrate that our approach both retains the mechanistic appeal of thinned autoregressions and substantially simplifies inference.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2509.10668,
title = {Modelling Under-Reported Data: Pitfalls of Na\"ive Approaches and a New Statistical Framework for Epidemic Curve Reconstruction},
author = {Justin J. Slater and Sindi Bebeziqi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10668},
year = {2025}
}