English

Modeling the Vertical Structure of Nuclear Starburst Discs: A Possible Source of AGN Obscuration at $z\sim 1$

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2017-04-03 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies

Abstract

Nuclear starburst discs (NSDs) are star-forming discs that may be residing in the nuclear regions of active galaxies at intermediate redshifts. One dimensional (1D) analytical models developed by Thompson et al. (2005) show that these discs can possess an inflationary atmosphere when dust is sublimated on parsec scales. This make NSDs a viable source for AGN obscuration. We model the two dimensional (2D) structure of NSDs using an iterative method in order to compute the explicit vertical solutions for a given annulus. These solutions satisfy energy and hydrostatic balance, as well as the radiative transfer equation. In comparison to the 1D model, the 2D calculation predicts a less extensive expansion of the atmosphere by orders of magnitude at the parsec/sub-parsec scale, but the new scale-height hh may still exceed the radial distance RR for various physical conditions. A total of 192 NSD models are computed across the input parameter space in order to predict distributions of a line of sight column density NHN_H. Assuming a random distribution of input parameters, the statistics yield 56% of Type 1, 23% of Compton-thin Type 2s (CN), and 21% of Compton-thick (CK) AGNs. Depending on a viewing angle (θ\theta) of a particular NSD (fixed physical conditions), any central AGN can appear to be Type 1, CN, or CK which is consistent with the basic unification theory of AGNs. Our results show that log[NH(cm2)]\log[N_H(\text{cm}^{-2})]\in [23,25.5] can be oriented at any θ\theta from 0^\circ to \approx80^\circ due to the degeneracy in the input parameters.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.09733,
  title  = {Modeling the Vertical Structure of Nuclear Starburst Discs: A Possible Source of AGN Obscuration at $z\sim 1$},
  author = {Raj Gohil and David R. Ballantyne},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09733},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

accepted by MNRAS