Model-Independent Constraints on Non-Unitary Neutrino Mixing from High-Precision Long-Baseline Experiments
Abstract
Our knowledge on the active 3 mixing angles (, , and ) and the CP phase is becoming accurate day-by-day enabling us to test the unitarity of the leptonic mixing matrix with utmost precision. Future high-precision long-baseline experiments are going to play an important role in this direction. In this work, we study the impact of possible non-unitary neutrino mixing (NUNM) in the context of next-generation long-baseline experiments DUNE and T2HKK/JD+KD having one detector in Japan (T2HK/JD) and a second detector in Korea (KD). We estimate the sensitivities of these setups to place direct, model-independent, and competitive constraints on various NUNM parameters. We demonstrate the possible correlations between the NUNM parameters, , and . Our numerical results obtained using only far detector data and supported by simple approximate analytical expressions of the oscillation probabilities in matter, reveal that JD+KD has better sensitivities for and as compared to DUNE, due to its larger statistics in the appearance channel and less systematic uncertainties in the disappearance channel, respectively. For , , and , DUNE gives better constraints as compared to JD+KD, due to its larger matter effect and wider neutrino energy spectrum. For , both DUNE and JD+KD give similar bounds. We also show how much the bounds on the NUNM parameters can be improved by combining the prospective data from DUNE and JD+KD setups. We find that due to zero-distance effects, the near detectors alone can also constrain , , and in both these setups. Finally, we observe that the appearance sample in DUNE can improve the constraints on and .
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2111.00329,
title = {Model-Independent Constraints on Non-Unitary Neutrino Mixing from High-Precision Long-Baseline Experiments},
author = {Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla and Sudipta Das and Alessio Giarnetti and Davide Meloni},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00329},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
39 pages, 10 figures, 11 tables, and 2 appendices. Published in JHEP