We propose MMLU-SR, a novel dataset designed to measure the true comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by challenging their performance in question-answering tasks with modified terms. We reasoned that an agent that "truly" understands a concept can still evaluate it when key terms are replaced by suitably defined alternate terms, and sought to differentiate such comprehension from mere text replacement. In our study, we modified standardized test questions by replacing a key term with a dummy word along with its definition. The key term could be in the context of questions, answers, or both questions and answers. Notwithstanding the high scores achieved by recent popular LLMs on the MMLU leaderboard, we found a substantial reduction in model performance after such replacement, suggesting poor comprehension. This new benchmark provides a rigorous benchmark for testing true model comprehension, and poses a challenge to the broader scientific community.
@article{arxiv.2406.15468,
title = {MMLU-SR: A Benchmark for Stress-Testing Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models},
author = {Wentian Wang and Sarthak Jain and Paul Kantor and Jacob Feldman and Lazaros Gallos and Hao Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15468},
year = {2024}
}