English

Minority spin dynamics in non-homogeneous Ising model: diverging timescales and exponents

Statistical Mechanics 2016-11-11 v3

Abstract

We investigate the dynamical behaviour of the Ising model under a zero temperature quench with the initial fraction of up spins 0x10\leq x\leq 1. In one dimension, the known results for persistence probability are verified; it shows algebraic decay for both up and down spins asymptotically with different exponents. It is found that the conventional finite size scaling is valid here. In two dimensions however, the persistence probabilities are no longer algebraic; in particular for x0.5x\leq 0.5, persistence for the up (minority) spins shows the behaviour Pmin(t)tγexp((t/τ)δ)P_{min}(t) \sim t^{-\gamma}\exp(-(t/\tau)^{\delta}) with time tt, while for the down (majority) spins, Pmaj(t)P_{maj}(t) approaches a finite value. We find that the timescale τ\tau diverges as (xcx)λ(x_c-x)^{- \lambda}, where xc=0.5x_c=0.5 and λ2.31\lambda\simeq2.31. The exponent γ\gamma varies as θ2d+c0(xcx)β\theta_{2d}+c_0(x_c-x)^{\beta} where θ2d0.215\theta_{2d}\simeq0.215 is very close to the persistence exponent in two dimensions; β1\beta\simeq1. The results in two dimensions can be understood qualitatively by studying the exit probability, which for different system size is found to have the form E(x)=f[(xxcxc)L1/ν]E(x) = f\big[(\frac{x-x_c}{x_c})L^{1/\nu}\big], with ν1.47\nu \approx 1.47. This result suggests that τLz~\tau \sim L^{\tilde{z}}, where z~=λν=1.57±0.11\tilde{z} = \frac{\lambda}{\nu} = 1.57 \pm 0.11 is an exponent not explored earlier.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1608.03399,
  title  = {Minority spin dynamics in non-homogeneous Ising model: diverging timescales and exponents},
  author = {Pratik Mullick and Parongama Sen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03399},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

The results presented in this paper have been later improved by generating new data especially closer to x = 0.5. A re-analysis of the scaling collapse leads to the value 1.269 for $\nu$. The estimate of $\tilde{z}$ using this value is $\simeq$ 1.82. Hence it can not be strongly stated that $\tilde{z}$ is different from 2