Middle Architecture Criteria
Abstract
Mid-level ontologies are used to integrate terminologies and data across disparate domains. There are, however, no clear, defensible criteria for determining whether a given ontology should count as mid-level, because we lack a rigorous characterization of what the middle level of generality is supposed to contain. Attempts to provide such a characterization have failed, we believe, because they have focused on the goal of specifying what is characteristic of those single ontologies that have been advanced as mid-level ontologies. Unfortunately, single ontologies of this sort are generally a mixture of top- and mid-level, and sometimes even of domain-level terms. To gain clarity, we aim to specify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a collection of one or more ontologies to inhabit what we call a mid-level architecture.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2404.17757,
title = {Middle Architecture Criteria},
author = {John Beverley and Giacomo De Colle and Mark Jensen and Carter Benson and Barry Smith},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17757},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
14 pages