English

Metallicity Calibration and Photometric Parallax Estimation: II. SDSS photometry

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2017-09-04 v2

Abstract

We used the updated [Fe/H] abundances of 168 F-G type dwarfs and calibrated them to a third order polynomial in terms of reduced ultraviolet excess, δ0.41\delta_{0.41} defined with ugrugr data in the SDSS. We estimated the MgM_g absolute magnitudes for the same stars via the re-reduced Hipparcos parallaxes and calibrated the absolute magnitude offsets, ΔMg\Delta M_g, relative to the intrinsic sequence of Hyades to a third order polynomial in terms of δ0.41\delta_{0.41}. The ranges of the calibrations are 2<-2<[Fe/H]\leq0.3 dex and 4<Mg64<M_g\leq6 mag. The mean of the residuals and the corresponding standard deviation for the metallicity calibration are 0 and 0.137 mag; while, for the absolute magnitude calibration they are 0 and 0.179 mag, respectively. We applied our procedures to 23,414 dwarf stars in the Galactic field with the Galactic coordinates 85b9085^{\circ}\leq b\leq90^{\circ}, 0l3600^{\circ}\leq l\leq360^{\circ} and size 78 deg2^{2}. We estimated absolute magnitude MgM_g dependent vertical metallicity gradients as a function of vertical distance ZZ. The gradients are deep in the range of 0<Z50<Z\leq5 kpc, while they are very small positive numbers beyond Z=5Z=5 kpc. All dwarfs with 5<Mg65<M_g\leq6 mag are thin-disc stars and their distribution shows a mode at (gr)00.38(g-r)_0\approx 0.38 mag, while the absolute magnitudes 4<Mg54<M_g\leq5 are dominated by thick disc and halo stars, i.e. the apparently bright ones (g018g_0\leq18 mag) are thick-disc stars with a mode at (gr)00.38(g-r)_0\sim0.38 mag, while the halo population is significant in the faint stars (g0>18g_0>18 mag).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1611.08095,
  title  = {Metallicity Calibration and Photometric Parallax Estimation: II. SDSS photometry},
  author = {S. Tuncel Guctekin and S. Bilir and S. Karaali and O. Plevne and S. Ak and T. Ak and Z. F. Bostanci},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.08095},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Eq. 11 was corrected, results and conclusions are the same. 16 pages, 16 figures and 5 tables, accepted for publication in Astrophysics and Space Science