While Medical Large Language Models (MedLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in clinical tasks, their ethical safety remains insufficiently explored. This paper introduces MedEthicsQA, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 5,623 multiple-choice questions and 5,351 open-ended questions for evaluation of medical ethics in LLMs. We systematically establish a hierarchical taxonomy integrating global medical ethical standards. The benchmark encompasses widely used medical datasets, authoritative question banks, and scenarios derived from PubMed literature. Rigorous quality control involving multi-stage filtering and multi-faceted expert validation ensures the reliability of the dataset with a low error rate (2.72%). Evaluation of state-of-the-art MedLLMs exhibit declined performance in answering medical ethics questions compared to their foundation counterparts, elucidating the deficiencies of medical ethics alignment. The dataset, registered under CC BY-NC 4.0 license, is available at https://github.com/JianhuiWei7/MedEthicsQA.
@article{arxiv.2506.22808,
title = {MedEthicsQA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Benchmark for Medical Ethics Evaluation of LLMs},
author = {Jianhui Wei and Zijie Meng and Zikai Xiao and Tianxiang Hu and Yang Feng and Zhijie Zhou and Jian Wu and Zuozhu Liu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22808},
year = {2025}
}