Measurement in the Age of LLMs: An Application to Ideological Scaling
Abstract
Much of social science is centered around terms like ``ideology'' or ``power'', which generally elude precise definition, and whose contextual meanings are trapped in surrounding language. This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to flexibly navigate the conceptual clutter inherent to social scientific measurement tasks. We rely on LLMs' remarkable linguistic fluency to elicit ideological scales of both legislators and text, which accord closely to established methods and our own judgement. A key aspect of our approach is that we elicit such scores directly, instructing the LLM to furnish numeric scores itself. This approach affords a great deal of flexibility, which we showcase through a variety of different case studies. Our results suggest that LLMs can be used to characterize highly subtle and diffuse manifestations of political ideology in text.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2312.09203,
title = {Measurement in the Age of LLMs: An Application to Ideological Scaling},
author = {Sean O'Hagan and Aaron Schein},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09203},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
Under review a Harvard Data Science Review. Previously presented at the 4th International Conference of Social Computing in Beijing, China, September 2023, the New Directions in Analyzing Text as Data (TADA) meeting in Amherst, MA, USA, November 2023, and the NeurIPS workshop titled "I Can't Believe It's Not Better!'' Failure Modes in the Age of Foundation Models in New Orleans, LA, December 2023