English

Maximum Bell Violations via Genetic Algorithm Search

Quantum Physics 2018-05-09 v1

Abstract

Bell inequality experiments measure the correlation coefficients of two spatially separated systems. In an EPR setup, at one location Alice has Na2N_a\geq 2 observables A={\Aj}1NaA =\{\A_j\}_1^{N_a} while at a second remote location Bob has Nb2N_b \geq2 observables B={\Bk}1NbB= \{\B_k\}_1^{N_b}. Within this bipartite environment each real Na×NbN_a \times N_b weight matrix WW constructs a Bell operator S^W\widehat{S}_W defined by the jkjk sum of Wjk\Aj\BkW_{jk}\, \A_j \otimes \B_k. Operator S^W\widehat{S}_W has the Bell non-locality boundary given by a hidden variable norm of WW. As the (A,B)(A,B) composition varies, quantum extremes arise when the S^W\widehat{S}_W operator norm has the greatest possible Bell violation. A genetic algorithm (GA) search over all (A,B)(A,B) is used to find examples of the Alice and Bob operators that realize quantum extremes. A class \XXN\XX_N of weights of special interest is given by the square Na=Nb=NN_a=N_b=N matrices having two ±1\pm 1 entries in each row and column with an odd number of minus signs. The class \XXN\XX_N is a natural extension of the 2×22 \times 2 CHSH family. For dimensions N=210N=2\sim10 the GA search finds that both the EPR correlation matrices and the Bell operator extremes do saturate their respective quantum bounds. Maximum Bell operator expectations fall between two benchmarks: the Bell inequality threshold and the quantum bound. The difference between these benchmarks is the quantum gap. Weight matrices WW that have zero quantum gap are determined by a row, column sum criteria.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1805.02783,
  title  = {Maximum Bell Violations via Genetic Algorithm Search},
  author = {T. A. Osborn and Adam Rogers},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02783},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

25 pages, 2 figures. Comments welcome!

R2 v1 2026-06-23T01:47:51.091Z