English

Maximizing Online Utilization with Commitment

Data Structures and Algorithms 2019-04-15 v1

Abstract

We investigate online scheduling with commitment for parallel identical machines. Our objective is to maximize the total processing time of accepted jobs. As soon as a job has been submitted, the commitment constraint forces us to decide immediately whether we accept or reject the job. Upon acceptance of a job, we must complete it before its deadline dd that satisfies d(1+ϵ)p+rd \geq (1+\epsilon)\cdot p + r, with pp and rr being the processing time and the submission time of the job, respectively while ϵ>0\epsilon>0 is the slack of the system. Since the hard case typically arises for near-tight deadlines, we consider ε1\varepsilon\leq 1. We use competitive analysis to evaluate our algorithms. Our first main contribution is a deterministic preemptive online algorithm with an almost tight competitive ratio on any number of machines. For a single machine, the competitive factor matches the optimal bound 1+ϵϵ\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon} of the greedy acceptance policy. Then the competitive ratio improves with an increasing number of machines and approaches (1+ϵ)ln1+ϵϵ(1+\epsilon)\cdot\ln \frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon} as the number of machines converges to infinity. This is an exponential improvement over the greedy acceptance policy for small ϵ\epsilon. In the non-preemptive case, we present a deterministic algorithm on mm machines with a competitive ratio of 1+m(1+ϵϵ)1m1+m\cdot \left(\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}\right)^{\frac{1}{m}}. This matches the optimal bound of 2+1ϵ2+\frac{1}{\epsilon} of the greedy acceptance policy for a single machine while it again guarantees an exponential improvement over the greedy acceptance policy for small ϵ\epsilon and large mm. In addition, we determine an almost tight lower bound that approaches m(1ϵ)1mm\cdot \left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)^{\frac{1}{m}} for large mm and small ϵ\epsilon.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1904.06150,
  title  = {Maximizing Online Utilization with Commitment},
  author = {Chris Schwiegelshohn and Uwe Schwiegelshohn},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.06150},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

13 pages