Matrix Rearrangement Inequalities Revisited
Functional Analysis
2021-11-01 v3 Operator Algebras
Abstract
Let ∣∣X∣∣p=Tr[(X∗X)p/2]1/p denote the p-Schatten norm of a matrix X∈Mn×n(C), and σ(X) the singular values with ↑ ↓ indicating its increasing or decreasing rearrangements. We wish to examine inequalities between ∣∣A+B∣∣pp+∣∣A−B∣∣pp, ∣∣σ↓(A)+σ↓(B)∣∣pp+∣∣σ↓(A)−σ↓(B)∣∣pp, and ∣∣σ↑(A)+σ↓(B)∣∣pp+∣∣σ↑(A)−σ↓(B)∣∣pp for various values of 1≤p<∞. It was conjectured in [6] that a universal inequality ∣∣σ↓(A)+σ↓(B)∣∣pp+∣∣σ↓(A)−σ↓(B)∣∣pp≤∣∣A+B∣∣pp+∣∣A−B∣∣pp≤∣∣σ↑(A)+σ↓(B)∣∣pp+∣∣σ↑(A)−σ↓(B)∣∣pp might hold for 1≤p≤2 and reverse at p≥2, potentially providing a stronger inequality to the generalization of Hanner's Inequality to complex matrices ∣∣A+B∣∣pp+∣∣A−B∣∣pp≥(∣∣A∣∣p+∣∣B∣∣p)p+∣∣∣A∣∣p−∣∣B∣∣p∣p. We extend some of the cases in which the inequalities of [5] hold, but offer counterexamples to any general rearrangement inequality holding. We simplify the original proofs of [6] with the technique of majorization. This also allows us to characterize the equality cases of all of the inequalities considered. We also address the commuting, unitary, and {A,B}=0 cases directly, and expand on the role of the anticommutator. In doing so, we extend Hanner's Inequality for self-adjoint matrices to the {A,B}=0 case for all ranges of p.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2009.04032,
title = {Matrix Rearrangement Inequalities Revisited},
author = {Victoria M Chayes},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.04032},
year = {2021}
}