Mathematical Theory of Evidence Versus Evidence
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the apparent greatest weakness of the Mathematical Theory of Evidence (MTE) of Shafer \cite{Shafer:76}, which has been strongly criticized by Wasserman \cite{Wasserman:92ijar}. Weaknesses of Shafer's proposal \cite{Shafer:90b} of probabilistic interpretation of MTE belief functions is demonstrated. Thereafter a new probabilistic interpretation of MTE conforming both to definition of belief function and to Dempster's rule of combination of independent evidence. It is shown that shaferian conditioning of belief functions on observations \cite{Shafer:90b} may be treated as selection combined with modification of data, that is data is not viewed as it is but it is casted into one's beliefs in what it should be like.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1811.04787,
title = {Mathematical Theory of Evidence Versus Evidence},
author = {Mieczysław Kłopotek},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04787},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1704.04000, arXiv:1707.03881