English

$\mathcal{L}^1$ limit solutions for control systems

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2015-02-12 v2 Optimization and Control

Abstract

For a control Cauchy problem x˙=f(t,x,u,v)+α=1mgα(x)u˙α,x(a)=xˉ,\dot x= {f}(t,x,u,v) +\sum_{\alpha=1}^m g_\alpha(x) \dot u_\alpha,\quad x(a)=\bar x, on an interval [a,b][a,b], we propose a notion of limit solution x,x, verifying the following properties: i) xx is defined for L1\mathcal{L}^1 (impulsive) inputs uu and for standard, bounded measurable, controls vv; ii) in the commutative case (i.e. when [gα,gβ]0,[g_{\alpha},g_{\beta}]\equiv 0, for all α,β=1,...,m\alpha,\beta=1,...,m), xx coincides with the solution one can obtain via the change of coordinates that makes the gαg_\alpha simultaneously constant; iii) xx subsumes former concepts of solution valid for the generic, noncommutative case. In particular, when uu has bounded variation, we investigate the relation between limit solutions and (single-valued) graph completion solutions. Furthermore, we prove consistency with the classical Carath\'eodory solution when uu and xx are absolutely continuous. Even though some specific problems are better addressed by means of special representations of the solutions, we believe that various theoretical issues call for a unified notion of trajectory. For instance, this is the case of optimal control problems, possibly with state and endpoint constraints, for which no extra assumptions (like e.g. coercivity, bounded variation, commutativity) are made in advance.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1401.0328,
  title  = {$\mathcal{L}^1$ limit solutions for control systems},
  author = {M. Soledad Aronna and Franco Rampazzo},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.0328},
  year   = {2015}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T02:37:59.398Z