English

Macroscopic Thermalization for Highly Degenerate Hamiltonians After Slight Perturbation

Statistical Mechanics 2025-07-29 v4 Mathematical Physics math.MP Quantum Physics

Abstract

We say of an isolated macroscopic quantum system in a pure state ψ\psi that it is in macroscopic thermal equilibrium (MATE) if ψ\psi lies in or close to a suitable subspace Heq\mathcal{H}_{eq} of Hilbert space. It is known that every initial state ψ0\psi_0 will eventually reach and stay there most of the time (``thermalize'') if the Hamiltonian is non-degenerate and satisfies the appropriate version of the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH), i.e., that every eigenvector is in MATE. Tasaki recently proved the ETH for a certain perturbation HθfFH_\theta^{fF} of the Hamiltonian H0fFH_0^{fF} of N1N\gg 1 free fermions on a one-dimensional lattice. The perturbation is needed to remove the high degeneracies of H0fFH_0^{fF}. Here, we first point out that also for degenerate Hamiltonians all ψ0\psi_0 thermalize if the ETH holds, i.e., if every eigenbasis lies in MATE, and we prove that this is the case for H0fFH_0^{fF}. Inspired by the fact that there is one eigenbasis of H0fFH_0^{fF} for which MATE can be proved more easily than for the others, with smaller error bounds, and also in higher spatial dimensions, we show for any given H0H_0 that the existence of one eigenbasis in MATE implies quite generally that most eigenbases of H0H_0 lie in MATE. We also show that, as a consequence, after adding a small generic perturbation, H=H0+λVH=H_0+\lambda V with λ1\lambda\ll 1, for most perturbations VV the perturbed Hamiltonian HH satisfies ETH and all states thermalize.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.15832,
  title  = {Macroscopic Thermalization for Highly Degenerate Hamiltonians After Slight Perturbation},
  author = {Barbara Roos and Shoki Sugimoto and Stefan Teufel and Roderich Tumulka and Cornelia Vogel},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15832},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

39 pages LaTeX, no figures; v4 major revision (stronger conclusion in Theorem 1) and one added author