English

Lower bounds on collective additive spanners

Combinatorics 2025-04-28 v1 Data Structures and Algorithms

Abstract

In this paper we present various lower bound results on collective tree spanners and on spanners of bounded treewidth. A graph GG is said to admit a system of μ\mu collective additive tree cc-spanners if there is a system T\cal{T}(G)(G) of at most μ\mu spanning trees of GG such that for any two vertices u,vu,v of GG a tree TTT\in \cal{T}(G)(G) exists such that the distance in TT between uu and vv is at most cc plus their distance in GG. A graph GG is said to admit an additive kk-treewidth cc-spanner if there is a spanning subgraph HH of GG with treewidth kk such that for any pair of vertices uu and vv their distance in HH is at most cc plus their distance in GG. Among other results, we show that: \bullet Any system of collective additive tree 11 -- spanners must have Ω(logn3)\Omega(\sqrt[3]{\log n}) spanning trees for some unit interval graphs; \bullet No system of a constant number of collective additive tree 22-spanners can exist for strongly chordal graphs; \bullet No system of a constant number of collective additive tree 33-spanners can exist for chordal graphs; \bullet No system of a constant number of collective additive tree cc-spanners can exist for weakly chordal graphs as well as for outerplanar graphs for any constant c0c\geq 0; \bullet For any constants k2k \ge 2 and c1c \ge 1 there are graphs of treewidth kk such that no spanning subgraph of treewidth k1k-1 can be an additive cc-spanner of such a graph. All these lower bound results apply also to general graphs. Furthermore, they %results complement known upper bound results with tight lower bound results.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2504.18508,
  title  = {Lower bounds on collective additive spanners},
  author = {Derek G. Corneil and Feodor F. Dragan and Ekkehard Köhler and Yang Xiang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18508},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

28 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-28T23:11:39.383Z