English

Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods

Optimization and Control 2017-11-03 v1

Abstract

We establish lower bounds on the complexity of finding ϵ\epsilon-stationary points of smooth, non-convex high-dimensional functions using first-order methods. We prove that deterministic first-order methods, even applied to arbitrarily smooth functions, cannot achieve convergence rates in ϵ\epsilon better than ϵ8/5\epsilon^{-8/5}, which is within ϵ1/15log1ϵ\epsilon^{-1/15}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon} of the best known rate for such methods. Moreover, for functions with Lipschitz first and second derivatives, we prove no deterministic first-order method can achieve convergence rates better than ϵ12/7\epsilon^{-12/7}, while ϵ2\epsilon^{-2} is a lower bound for functions with only Lipschitz gradient. For convex functions with Lipschitz gradient, accelerated gradient descent achieves the rate ϵ1log1ϵ\epsilon^{-1}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon}, showing that finding stationary points is easier given convexity.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1711.00841,
  title  = {Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points II: First-Order Methods},
  author = {Yair Carmon and John C. Duchi and Oliver Hinder and Aaron Sidford},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00841},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T22:34:19.221Z