English

Loop group actions on categories and Whittaker invariants

Representation Theory 2017-12-14 v2

Abstract

We develop some aspects of the theory of DD-modules on ind-schemes of pro-finite type. These notions are used to define DD-modules on (algebraic) loop groups and, consequently, actions of loop groups on DG categories. Let NN be the maximal unipotent subgroup of a reductive group GG. For a non-degenerate character χ:N( ⁣(t) ⁣)Ga\chi: N(\!(t)\!) \to \mathbb{G}_a and a category C\mathcal{C} acted upon by N( ⁣(t) ⁣)N(\!(t)\!) , we define the category CN( ⁣(t) ⁣),χ\mathcal{C}^{N(\!(t)\!), \chi} of (N( ⁣(t) ⁣),χ)(N(\!(t)\!), \chi)-invariant objects, along with the coinvariant category CN( ⁣(t) ⁣),χ\mathcal{C}_{N(\!(t)\!), \chi}. These are the Whittaker categories of C\mathcal{C}, which are in general not equivalent. However, there is always a family of functors Θk:CN( ⁣(t) ⁣),χCN( ⁣(t) ⁣),χ\Theta_k: \mathcal{C}_{N(\!(t)\!), \chi} \to \mathcal{C}^{N(\!(t)\!), \chi}, parametrized by kZk \in \mathbb{Z}. We conjecture that each Θk\Theta_k is an equivalence, provided that the N( ⁣(t) ⁣)N(\!(t)\!)-action on C\mathcal{C} extends to a G( ⁣(t) ⁣)G(\!(t)\!)-action. Using the Fourier-Deligne transform (adapted to Tate vector spaces), we prove this conjecture for G=GLnG= GL_n and show that the Whittaker categories can be obtained by taking invariants of C\mathcal{C} with respect to a very explicit pro-unipotent group subscheme (not ind-scheme) of G( ⁣(t) ⁣)G(\!(t)\!).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1310.5127,
  title  = {Loop group actions on categories and Whittaker invariants},
  author = {Dario Beraldo},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.5127},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T01:49:54.301Z