Benchmark scores for Large Language Models (LLMs) can be inflated by memorization of test items or near duplicates. We present a simple, protocol that probes generalization by re-evaluating models on paraphrased versions of benchmark questions. Using Mistral-7B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, we measure the accuracy gap between original and paraphrased items on ARC-Easy and ARC-Challenge. Our pipeline controls decoding, enforces multiple-choice output format, and includes a robust paraphrase-cleaning step to preserve semantics. We find that paraphrasing induces a non-trivial accuracy drop (original vs. paraphrased), consistent with prior concerns about contamination and brittle surface-form shortcuts.
@article{arxiv.2510.08616,
title = {LLMs Show Surface-Form Brittleness Under Paraphrase Stress Tests},
author = {Juan Miguel Navarro Carranza},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08616},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
NeurIPS 2025 Workshop. Evaluating the Evolving LLM Lifecycle: Benchmarks, Emergent Abilities, and Scaling. Selected for contributed talk