English

LiteBIRD Science Goals and Forecasts. A Case Study of the Origin of Primordial Gravitational Waves using Large-Scale CMB Polarization

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2025-03-25 v2 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

We study the possibility of using the LiteBIRDLiteBIRD satellite BB-mode survey to constrain models of inflation producing specific features in CMB angular power spectra. We explore a particular model example, i.e. spectator axion-SU(2) gauge field inflation. This model can source parity-violating gravitational waves from the amplification of gauge field fluctuations driven by a pseudoscalar "axionlike" field, rolling for a few e-folds during inflation. The sourced gravitational waves can exceed the vacuum contribution at reionization bump scales by about an order of magnitude and can be comparable to the vacuum contribution at recombination bump scales. We argue that a satellite mission with full sky coverage and access to the reionization bump scales is necessary to understand the origin of the primordial gravitational wave signal and distinguish among two production mechanisms: quantum vacuum fluctuations of spacetime and matter sources during inflation. We present the expected constraints on model parameters from LiteBIRDLiteBIRD satellite simulations, which complement and expand previous studies in the literature. We find that LiteBIRDLiteBIRD will be able to exclude with high significance standard single-field slow-roll models, such as the Starobinsky model, if the true model is the axion-SU(2) model with a feature at CMB scales. We further investigate the possibility of using the parity-violating signature of the model, such as the TBTB and EBEB angular power spectra, to disentangle it from the standard single-field slow-roll scenario. We find that most of the discriminating power of LiteBIRDLiteBIRD will reside in BBBB angular power spectra rather than in TBTB and EBEB correlations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2312.00717,
  title  = {LiteBIRD Science Goals and Forecasts. A Case Study of the Origin of Primordial Gravitational Waves using Large-Scale CMB Polarization},
  author = {P. Campeti and E. Komatsu and C. Baccigalupi and M. Ballardini and N. Bartolo and A. Carones and J. Errard and F. Finelli and R. Flauger and S. Galli and G. Galloni and S. Giardiello and M. Hazumi and S. Henrot-Versillé and L. T. Hergt and K. Kohri and C. Leloup and J. Lesgourgues and J. Macias-Perez and E. Martínez-González and S. Matarrese and T. Matsumura and L. Montier and T. Namikawa and D. Paoletti and D. Poletti and M. Remazeilles and M. Shiraishi and B. van Tent and M. Tristram and L. Vacher and N. Vittorio and G. Weymann-Despres and A. Anand and J. Aumont and R. Aurlien and A. J. Banday and R. B. Barreiro and A. Basyrov and M. Bersanelli and D. Blinov and M. Bortolami and T. Brinckmann and E. Calabrese and F. Carralot and F. J. Casas and L. Clermont and F. Columbro and G. Conenna and A. Coppolecchia and F. Cuttaia and G. D'Alessandro and P. de Bernardis and M. De Petris and S. Della Torre and E. Di Giorgi and P. Diego-Palazuelos and H. K. Eriksen and C. Franceschet and U. Fuskeland and M. Galloway and M. Georges and M. Gerbino and M. Gervasi and T. Ghigna and C. Gimeno-Amo and E. Gjerløw and A. Gruppuso and J. Gudmundsson and N. Krachmalnicoff and L. Lamagna and M. Lattanzi and M. Lembo and A. I. Lonappan and S. Masi and M. Massa and S. Micheli and A. Moggi and M. Monelli and G. Morgante and B. Mot and L. Mousset and R. Nagata and P. Natoli and A. Novelli and I. Obata and L. Pagano and A. Paiella and V. Pavlidou and F. Piacentini and M. Pinchera and G. Pisano and G. Puglisi and N. Raffuzzi and A. Ritacco and A. Rizzieri and M. Ruiz-Granda and G. Savini and D. Scott and G. Signorelli and S. L. Stever and N. Stutzer and R. M. Sullivan and A. Tartari and K. Tassis and L. Terenzi and K. L. Thompson and P. Vielva and I. K. Wehus and Y. Zhou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00717},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

22 pages, 13 figures. Published in JCAP 06 (2024) 008. Added comments at end of Sec. 6 reframing conclusions in more general way. Updated references