English

Lions and Contamination: Trees and General Graphs

Combinatorics 2026-04-22 v1 Computational Complexity

Abstract

This paper investigates a special variant of a pursuit-evasion game called lions and contamination. In a graph where all vertices are initially contaminated, a set of lions traverses the graph, clearing the contamination from every vertex they visit. However, the contamination simultaneously spreads to any adjacent vertex not occupied by a lion. We analyze the relationships among the lion number L(G)\mathcal{L}(G), monotone lion number Lm(G)\mathcal{L}^m(G), and the graph's pathwidth pw(G)\operatorname{pw}(G). Our main results are as follows: (a) We prove a monotonicity property: for any graph GG and its isometric subgraph HH, L(H)L(G)\mathcal{L}(H)\le \mathcal{L}(G). (b) For trees TT, we show that the lion number is tightly characterized by pathwidth, satisfying pw(T)L(T)pw(T)+1\operatorname{pw}(T)\le \mathcal{L}(T)\le \operatorname{pw}(T)+1. (c) We provide a counterexample showing that the monotonicity property fails for arbitrary subgraphs. (d) We show that, in contrast to the tree case, pathwidth does not yield a general lower bound on L(G)\mathcal{L}(G) for arbitrary graphs. (e) For any connected graph GG, we prove the general upper bound L(G)pw(G)+1\mathcal{L}(G)\le \operatorname{pw}(G)+1. (f) For the monotone variant, we establish the general lower bound pw(G)Lm(G)\operatorname{pw}(G)\le \mathcal{L}^m(G). (g) Conversely, we show that Lm(G)2pw(G)+2\mathcal{L}^m(G)\le 2\operatorname{pw}(G)+2 holds for all connected graphs, which is best possible up to a small additive constant.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.18949,
  title  = {Lions and Contamination: Trees and General Graphs},
  author = {Dohoon Kim and Eungyu Woo and Donghoon Shin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.18949},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T12:27:28.127Z