Line Cover and Related Problems
Abstract
We study extensions of the classic \emph{Line Cover} problem, which asks whether a set of points in the plane can be covered using lines. Line Cover is known to be NP-hard, and we focus on two natural generalizations. The first is \textbf{Line Clustering}, where the goal is to find lines minimizing the sum of squared distances from the input points to their nearest line. The second is \textbf{Hyperplane Cover}, which asks whether points in can be covered by hyperplanes. We also study the more general \textbf{Projective Clustering} problem, which unifies both settings and has applications in machine learning, data analysis, and computational geometry. In this problem, one seeks affine subspaces of dimension that minimize the sum of squared distances from the given points in to the nearest subspace. Our results reveal notable differences in the parameterized complexity of these problems. While Line Cover is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by , we show that Line Clustering is W[1]-hard with respect to and does not admit an algorithm with running time unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Hyperplane Cover has been known to be NP-hard since the 1980s, following work of Megiddo and Tamir, even for , we show that it remains NP-hard even when . Finally, we present an algorithm for Projective Clustering running in time. This bound matches our lower bound for Line Clustering and generalizes the classic algorithm for -Means Clustering () by Inaba, Katoh, and Imai [SoCG 1994].
Cite
@article{arxiv.2512.17268,
title = {Line Cover and Related Problems},
author = {Matthias Bentert and Fedor v. Fomin and Petr A. Golovach and Souvik Saha and Sanjay Seetharaman and Kirill Simonov and Anannya Upasana},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17268},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Accepted to STACS 2026