English

Le canard de Painlev\'e

Dynamical Systems 2018-09-28 v3

Abstract

We consider the problem of a slender rod slipping along a rough surface. Painlev\'e \cite{Painleve1895, Painleve1905a,Painleve1905b} showed that the governing rigid body equations for this problem can exhibit multiple solutions (the {\it indeterminate} case) or no solutions at all (the {\it inconsistent} case), provided the coefficient of friction μ\mu exceeds a certain critical value μP\mu_P. Subsequently G\'enot and Brogliato \cite{GenotBrogliato1999} proved that, from a consistent state, the rod cannot reach an inconsistent state through slipping. Instead there is a special solution for μ>μC>μP\mu>\mu_C>\mu_P, with μC\mu_C a new critical value of the coefficient of friction, where the rod continues to slip until it reaches a singular `0/00/0' point PP. Even though the rigid body equations can not describe what happens to the rod beyond the singular point PP, it is possible to extend the special solution into the region of indeterminacy. This extended solution is very reminiscent of a {\it canard} \cite{Benoit81}. To overcome the inadequacy of the rigid body equations beyond PP, the rigid body assumption is relaxed in the neighbourhood of the point of contact of the rod with the rough surface. Physically this corresponds to assuming a small compliance there. It is natural to ask what happens to both the point PP and the special solution under this regularization, in the limit of vanishing compliance. In this paper, we prove the existence of a canard orbit in a reduced 4D4D slow-fast phase space, connecting a 2D2D focus-type slow manifold with the stable manifold of a 2D2D saddle-type slow manifold. The proof combines several methods from local dynamical system theory, including blowup. The analysis is not standard, since we only gain ellipticity rather than hyperbolicity with our initial blowup.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.07665,
  title  = {Le canard de Painlev\'e},
  author = {K. Uldall Kristiansen and S. J. Hogan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07665},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

We have modified the interpretation of Proposition 1 on p. 10

R2 v1 2026-06-22T18:53:46.201Z