English

Lattice theory of torsion classes: Beyond $\tau$-tilting theory

Representation Theory 2024-08-13 v4 Combinatorics Rings and Algebras

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to establish a lattice theoretical framework to study the partially ordered set torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A of torsion classes over a finite-dimensional algebra AA. We show that torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A is a complete lattice which enjoys very strong properties, as bialgebraicity and complete semidistributivity. Thus its Hasse quiver carries the important part of its structure, and we introduce the brick labelling of its Hasse quiver and use it to study lattice congruences of torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A. In particular, we give a representation-theoretical interpretation of the so-called forcing order, and we prove that torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A is completely congruence uniform. When II is a two-sided ideal of AA, tors(A/I)\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} (A/I) is a lattice quotient of torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A which is called an algebraic quotient, and the corresponding lattice congruence is called an algebraic congruence. The second part of this paper consists in studying algebraic congruences. We characterize the arrows of the Hasse quiver of torsA\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} A that are contracted by an algebraic congruence in terms of the brick labelling. In the third part, we study in detail the case of preprojective algebras Π\Pi, for which torsΠ\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} \Pi is the Weyl group endowed with the weak order. In particular, we give a new, more representation theoretical proof of the isomorphism between torskQ\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} k Q and the Cambrian lattice when QQ is a Dynkin quiver. We also prove that, in type AA, the algebraic quotients of torsΠ\operatorname{\mathsf{tors}} \Pi are exactly its Hasse-regular lattice quotients.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1711.01785,
  title  = {Lattice theory of torsion classes: Beyond $\tau$-tilting theory},
  author = {Laurent Demonet and Osamu Iyama and Nathan Reading and Idun Reiten and Hugh Thomas},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.01785},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

v2: Many improvements compared to the first version (in particular, more discussion about complete congruence uniform lattices). v3: Added subtitle and made other minor changes. v4: Post-publication correction of an error in the proof of Proposition 2.6. (Thanks to Lorenzo Molena for pointing out the error.)