Laser-based metrology systems vs wavefront sensing techniques: a comparative overview between the Large Binocular Telescope and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory for the telescope alignment and collimation tracking

This work presents a comparative overview of the collimation and alignment strategies employed by two leading 8m-class facilities: the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. While both telescopes share a challenging fast f-number of approximately f/1.2 (considering the LBT in its Prime Focus configuration), they have adopted reciprocal architectures for the initial optical alignment strategy and for maintaining collimation during the night. As an initial alignment strategy, the LBT relies on a Wavefront Sensing technique called Focal Plane Image Analysis. Conversely, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory baseline foresees the usage of a Laser Tracker system to establish the initial optical states. The strategies for preserving the optical alignment and maintaining the collimation against gravitational flexure and thermal drift during observations are instead reversed. Besides the use of open-loop corrections based on Look-Up Tables, common on both telescopes, the LBT utilizes a laser-based Telescope Metrology System to monitor the relative position of optics in real-time, applying the corrections between the exposures. In contrast, the Rubin Observatory employs a Curvature Wavefront Sensing technique, using dedicated detectors at the four corners of the focal plane. Rather than identifying a best strategy, this work aims to synthesize the strengths, limitations, and operational trade-offs of these complementary approaches, from the perspective of the next generation of Extremely Large Telescopes and their instruments.