English

$L^1$-Dini conditions and limiting behavior of weak type estimates for singular integrals

Analysis of PDEs 2016-02-26 v2

Abstract

In 2006, Janakiraman [10] showed that if Ω\Omega with mean value zero on Sn1S^{n-1} satisfies the condition supξ=1Sn1Ω(θ)Ω(θ+δξ)dσ(θ)CnδSn1Ω(θ)dσ(θ),0<δ<1n, () \sup_{|\xi|=1}\int_{S^{n-1}}|\Omega(\theta)-\Omega(\theta+\delta\xi)|d\sigma(\theta)\leq Cn\delta\int_{S^{n-1}}|\Omega(\theta)|d\sigma(\theta),\quad 0<\delta<\frac{1}{n},\ (\ast) then for the singular integral operator TΩT_\Omega with homogeneous kernel, the following limiting behavior holds: limλ0λm({xRn:TΩf(x)>λ})=1nΩ1f1,for fL1(Rn) with f0. ()\lim\limits_{\lambda\rightarrow 0}\lambda m(\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n:|T_\Omega f(x)|>\lambda\})= \frac{1}{n}\|\Omega\|_{1}\|f\|_{1},\quad \text{for}\ f\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^n)\ \text{with}\ f\geq 0.\ (\ast\ast) In the present paper, we prove that if replacing the condition ()(\ast) by more general condition, the L1L^1-Dini condition, then the limiting behavior ()(\ast\ast) still holds for the singular integral TΩT_\Omega. In particular, we give an example which satisfies the L1L^1-Dini condition, but does not satisfy ()(\ast). Hence, we improve essentially the above result given in [10]. To prove our conclusion, we show that the L1L^1-Dini conditions defined respectively via the rotation and translation on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent (see Theorem 2.5 below), which has its own interest in the theory of singular integrals. Moreover, similar limiting behavior for the fractional integral operator TΩ,αT_{\Omega,\alpha} with homogeneous kernel is also established in this paper.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1508.07519,
  title  = {$L^1$-Dini conditions and limiting behavior of weak type estimates for singular integrals},
  author = {Yong Ding and Xudong Lai},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.07519},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

18 pages, typos are corrected, to appear in Rev. Mat. Iberoam