English

KMT-2021-BLG-0322: Severe degeneracy between triple-lens and higher-order binary-lens interpretations

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics 2021-11-17 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Abstract

We investigate the microlensing event KMT-2021-BLG-0322, for which the light curve exhibits three distinctive sets of caustic-crossing features. It is found that the overall features of the light curve are approximately described by a binary-lens (2L1S) model, but the model leaves substantial residuals. We test various interpretations with the aim of explaining the residuals. We find that the residuals can be explained either by considering a nonrectilinear lens-source motion caused by the microlens-parallax and lens-orbital effects or by adding a low-mass companion to the binary lens (3L1S model). The degeneracy between the higher-order 2L1S model and the 3L1S model is very severe, making it difficult to single out a correct solution based on the photometric data. This degeneracy was known before for two previous events (MACHO-97-BLG-41 and OGLE-2013-BLG-0723), which led to the false detections of planets in binary systems, and thus the identification of the degeneracy for KMT-2021-BLG-0322 illustrates that the degeneracy can be not only common but also very severe, emphasizing the need to check both interpretations of deviations from 2L1S models. From the Bayesian analysis conducted with the measured lensing observables of the event timescale, angular Einstein radius, and microlens parallax, it was estimated that the binary lens components have masses (M1,M2)=(0.620.26+0.25 M,0.070.03+0.03 M)(M_1, M_2) =(0.62^{+0.25}_{-0.26}~M_\odot,0.07^{+0.03}_{-0.03}~M_\odot), for both 2L1S and 3L1S solutions, and the mass of the tertiary lens component according to the 3L1S solution is M3=6.402.78+2.64 MJM_3=6.40^{+2.64}_{-2.78}~M_{\rm J}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2109.02210,
  title  = {KMT-2021-BLG-0322: Severe degeneracy between triple-lens and higher-order binary-lens interpretations},
  author = {Cheongho Han and Andrew Gould and Yuki Hirao and Chung-Uk Lee and Michael D. Albrow and Sun-Ju Chung and Kyu-Ha Hwang and Youn Kil Jung and Doeon Kim and Shude Mao and Yoon-Hyun Ryu and In-Gu Shin and Yossi Shvartzvald and Jennifer C. Yee and Weicheng Zang and Sang-Mok Cha and Dong-Jin Kim and Hyoun-Woo Kim and Seung-Lee Kim and Dong-Joo Lee and Yongseok Lee and Byeong-Gon Park and Richard W. Pogge and Fumio Abe and Richard Barry and David P. Bennett and Aparna Bhattacharya and Ian Bond and Martin Donachie and Hirosane Fujii and Akihiko Fukui and Yoshitaka Itow and Rintaro Kirikawa and Iona Kondo and Naoki Koshimoto and Man Cheung Alex Li and Yutaka Matsubara and Yasushi Muraki and Shota Miyazaki and Clément Ranc and Nicholas J. Rattenbury and Yuki Satoh and Hikaru Shoji and Takahiro Sumi and Daisuke Suzuki and Yuzuru Tanaka and Paul J. Tristram and Tsubasa Yamawaki and Atsunori Yonehara},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.02210},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

9 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables