English

Joint excitation probability for two harmonic oscillators in dimension one and the Mott problem

Quantum Physics 2007-11-15 v1 Mathematical Physics math.MP

Abstract

We analyze a one dimensional quantum system consisting of a test particle interacting with two harmonic oscillators placed at the positions a1a_1, a2a_2, with a1>0a_1 >0, a2>a1|a_2|>a_1, in the two possible situations: a2>0a_2>0 and a2<0a_2 <0. At time zero the harmonic oscillators are in their ground state and the test particle is in a superposition state of two wave packets centered in the origin with opposite mean momentum. %±Mv0\pm M v_0. Under suitable assumptions on the physical parameters of the model, we consider the time evolution of the wave function and we compute the probability Pn1n2(t)\mathcal{P}^{-}_{n_1 n_2} (t) (resp. Pn1n2+(t)\mathcal{P}^{+}_{n_1 n_2} (t)) that both oscillators are in the excited states labelled by n1n_1, n2>0n_2 >0 at time t>a2v01t > |a_2| v_0^{-1} when a2<0a_2 <0 (resp. a2>0a_2 >0). We prove that Pn1n2(t)\mathcal{P}_{n_1 n_2}^- (t) is negligible with respect to Pn1n2+(t)\mathcal{P}_{n_1 n_2}^+ (t), up to second order in time dependent perturbation theory. The system we consider is a simplified, one dimensional version of the original model of a cloud chamber introduced by Mott in \cite{m}, where the result was argued using euristic arguments in the framework of the time independent perturbation theory for the stationary Schr\"{o}dinger equation. The method of the proof is entirely elementary and it is essentially based on a stationary phase argument. We also remark that all the computations refer to the Schr\"{o}dinger equation for the three-particle system, with no reference to the wave packet collapse postulate.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0711.2230,
  title  = {Joint excitation probability for two harmonic oscillators in dimension one and the Mott problem},
  author = {Gianfausto Dell'Antonio and Rodolfo Figari and Alessandro Teta},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0711.2230},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

26 pages