Joins of closed sublocales are not always a coframe
Abstract
Given a locale , the collection of joins of closed sublocales forms a frame--somewhat unexpectedly, as it is naturally embedded in the coframe of all sublocales of , where by coframe we mean the order-theoretic dual of a frame. This construction has attracted attention in point-free topology: as a maximal essential extension in the category of frames, for its (non-)functorial properties, its relation to canonical extensions and exact filters of frames, etc. A central open question of the theory, posed by Picado, Pultr, and Tozzi in 2019, asked whether is always a coframe, or whether there exists a locale for which this fails. In this paper, we resolve this question in the negative by constructing a locale such that is not a coframe. The main challenge in such questions lies in the difficulty of understanding exact infima in ; we circumvent this by analysing a certain separation property satisfied by .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2510.00987,
title = {Joins of closed sublocales are not always a coframe},
author = {Igor Arrieta},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00987},
year = {2026}
}