English

Isobaric Yield Ratio Difference in Heavy-ion Collisions, and Comparison to Isoscaling

Nuclear Experiment 2013-11-06 v3

Abstract

An isobaric yield ratio difference (IBD) method is proposed to study the ratio of the difference between the chemical potential of neutron and proton to temperature (Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T) in heavy-ion collisions. The Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T determined by the IBD method (IB-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T) is compared to the results of the isoscaling method (IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T), which uses the isotopic or the isotonic yield ratio. Similar distributions of the IB- and IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T are found in the measured 140AA MeV 40,48^{40,48}Ca + 9^{9}Be and the 58,64^{58,64}Ni + 9^{9}Be reactions. The IB- and IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T both have a distribution with a plateau in the small mass fragments plus an increasing part in the fragments of relatively larger mass. The IB- and IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T plateaus show dependence on the n/pn/p ratio of the projectile. It is suggested that the height of the plateau is decided by the difference between the neutron density (ρn\rho_n) and the proton density (ρp\rho_p) distributions of the projectiles, and the width shows the overlapping volume of the projectiles in which ρn\rho_n and ρp\rho_p change very little. The difference between the IB- and IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T is explained by the isoscaling parameters being constrained by the many isotopes and isotones, while the IBD method only uses the yields of two isobars. It is suggested that the IB-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T is more reasonable than the IS-Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T, especially when the isotopic or isotonic ratio disobeys the isoscaling. As to the question whether the Δμ/T\Delta\mu/T depends on the density or the temperature, the density dependence is preferred since the low density can result in low temperature in the peripheral reactions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1303.2924,
  title  = {Isobaric Yield Ratio Difference in Heavy-ion Collisions, and Comparison to Isoscaling},
  author = {Chun-Wang Ma and Shan-Shan Wang and Yan-Li Zhang and Hui-Ling Wei},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1303.2924},
  year   = {2013}
}

Comments

6 pages, 6 figures, mistake of reference corrected