English

ISLES'24: Final Infarct Prediction with Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Data. Where Do We Stand?

Image and Video Processing 2025-07-08 v2 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Accurate estimation of brain infarction (i.e., irreversibly damaged tissue) is critical for guiding treatment decisions in acute ischemic stroke. Reliable infarct prediction informs key clinical interventions, including the need for patient transfer to comprehensive stroke centers, the potential benefit of additional reperfusion attempts during mechanical thrombectomy, decisions regarding secondary neuroprotective treatments, and ultimately, prognosis of clinical outcomes. This work introduces the Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation (ISLES) 2024 challenge, which focuses on the prediction of final infarct volumes from pre-interventional acute stroke imaging and clinical data. ISLES24 provides a comprehensive, multimodal setting where participants can leverage all clinically and practically available data, including full acute CT imaging, sub-acute follow-up MRI, and structured clinical information, across a train set of 150 cases. On the hidden test set of 98 cases, the top-performing model, a multimodal nnU-Net-based architecture, achieved a Dice score of 0.285 (+/- 0.213) and an absolute volume difference of 21.2 (+/- 37.2) mL, underlining the significant challenges posed by this task and the need for further advances in multimodal learning. This work makes two primary contributions: first, we establish a standardized, clinically realistic benchmark for post-treatment infarct prediction, enabling systematic evaluation of multimodal algorithmic strategies on a longitudinal stroke dataset; second, we analyze current methodological limitations and outline key research directions to guide the development of next-generation infarct prediction models.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.10966,
  title  = {ISLES'24: Final Infarct Prediction with Multimodal Imaging and Clinical Data. Where Do We Stand?},
  author = {Ezequiel de la Rosa and Ruisheng Su and Mauricio Reyes and Evamaria O. Riedel and Hakim Baazaoui and Roland Wiest and Florian Kofler and Kaiyuan Yang and David Robben and Mahsa Mojtahedi and Laura van Poppel and Lucas de Vries and Anthony Winder and Kimberly Amador and Nils D. Forkert and Gyeongyeon Hwang and Jiwoo Song and Dohyun Kim and Eneko Uruñuela and Annabella Bregazzi and Matthias Wilms and Hyun Yang and Jin Tae Kwak and Sumin Jung and Luan Matheus Trindade Dalmazo and Kumaradevan Punithakumar and Moona Mazher and Abdul Qayyum and Steven Niederer and Jacob Idoko and Mariana Bento and Gouri Ginde and Tianyi Ren and Juampablo Heras Rivera and Mehmet Kurt and Carole Frindel and Susanne Wegener and Jan S. Kirschke and Benedikt Wiestler and Bjoern Menze},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10966},
  year   = {2025}
}