English

Is Training Necessary for Anomaly Detection?

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2026-02-03 v2

Abstract

Current state-of-the-art multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection (MUAD) methods rely on training encoder-decoder models to reconstruct anomaly-free features. We first show these approaches have an inherent fidelity-stability dilemma in how they detect anomalies via reconstruction residuals. We then abandon the reconstruction paradigm entirely and propose Retrieval-based Anomaly Detection (RAD). RAD is a training-free approach that stores anomaly-free features in a memory and detects anomalies through multi-level retrieval, matching test patches against the memory. Experiments demonstrate that RAD achieves state-of-the-art performance across four established benchmarks (MVTec-AD, VisA, Real-IAD, 3D-ADAM) under both standard and few-shot settings. On MVTec-AD, RAD reaches 96.7\% Pixel AUROC with just a single anomaly-free image compared to 98.5\% of RAD's full-data performance. We further prove that retrieval-based scores theoretically upper-bound reconstruction-residual scores. Collectively, these findings overturn the assumption that MUAD requires task-specific training, showing that state-of-the-art anomaly detection is feasible with memory-based retrieval. Our code is available at https://github.com/longkukuhi/RAD.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2601.22763,
  title  = {Is Training Necessary for Anomaly Detection?},
  author = {Xingwu Zhang and Guanxuan Li and Paul Henderson and Gerardo Aragon-Camarasa and Zijun Long},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22763},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T09:27:27.649Z