Recently, Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) combined two independent measurements of H(z) from BAO data with the value of the Hubble constant H0=H(z=0), in order to test the cosmological constant hypothesis by means of an improved version of the Om diagnostic. Their result indicated a considerable tension between observations and predictions of the ΛCDM model. However, such strong conclusion was based only on three measurements of H(z). This motivated us to repeat similar work on a larger sample. By using a comprehensive data set of 29 H(z), we find that discrepancy indeed exists. Even though the value of Ωm,0h2 inferred from Omh2 diagnostic depends on the way one chooses to make a summary statistics (weighted mean or the median), the persisting discrepancy supports the claims of Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) that ΛCDM model may not be the best description of our Universe.
@article{arxiv.1503.04923,
title = {Is there evidence for dark energy evolution?},
author = {Xuheng Ding and Marek Biesiada and Shuo Cao and Zhengxiang Li and Zong-Hong Zhu},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.04923},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
8 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in the ApJL