English

Invisible neutrino decay : First vs second oscillation maximum

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2021-06-02 v1

Abstract

We study the physics potential of the long-baseline experiments T2HK, T2HKK and ESSν\nuSB in the context of invisible neutrino decay. We consider normal mass ordering and assume that the state ν3\nu_{3} as unstable, decaying into sterile states during the flight and obtain constraints on the neutrino decay lifetime (τ3\tau_3). We find that T2HK, T2HKK and ESSν\nuSB are sensitive to the decay-rate of ν3\nu_{3} for τ3/m32.72×1011\tau_{3}/m_{3} \leq 2.72\times10^{-11}s/eV, τ3/m34.36×1011\tau_{3}/m_{3} \leq 4.36\times10^{-11}s/eV and τ3/m32.43×1011\tau_{3}/m_{3} \leq 2.43\times10^{-11}s/eV respectively at 3σ\sigma C.L. We compare and contrast the sensitivities of the three experiments and specially investigate the role played by the mixing angle θ23\theta_{23}. It is seen that for experiments with flux peak near the second oscillation maxima, the poorer sensitivity to θ23\theta_{23} results in weaker constraints on the decay lifetime. Although, T2HKK has one detector close to the second oscillation maxima, having another detector at the first oscillation maxima results in superior sensitivity to decay. In addition, we find a synergy between the two baselines of the T2HKK experiment which helps in giving a better sensitivity for θ23\theta_{23} in the higher octant. We discuss the octant sensitivity in presence of decay and show that there is an enhancement in sensitivity which occurs due to the contribution from the survival probability PμμP_{\mu\mu} which is more pronounced for the experiments at the second oscillation maxima. We also obtain the combined sensitivity of T2HK+ESSν\nuSB and T2HKK+ESSν\nuSB as τ3/m34.36×1011\tau_{3}/m_{3} \leq 4.36\times10^{-11}s/eV and τ3/m35.53×1011\tau_{3}/m_{3} \leq 5.53\times10^{-11}s/eV respectively at 3σ\sigma C.L.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2012.04958,
  title  = {Invisible neutrino decay : First vs second oscillation maximum},
  author = {Kaustav Chakraborty and Debajyoti Dutta and Srubabati Goswami and Dipyaman Pramanik},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04958},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

12 figure, 4 tables

R2 v1 2026-06-23T20:50:25.711Z