English

Inverse Chameleon Mechanism and Mass Limits for Compact Stars

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2021-08-11 v3 High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena Solar and Stellar Astrophysics High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

As is well known, there are various mass limits for compact stars. For example, the maximum mass for non-rotating white dwarfs is given by the famous Chandrasekhar limit about 1.4M1.4 M_\odot (solar masses). Although the mass limit for neutron stars is not so clear to date, one of the widely accepted values is about 2.1M2.1 M_\odot\,. Recently, challenges to these mass limits appeared. Motivated by the super-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs with masses up to 2.42.8M2.4 \sim 2.8 M_\odot\,, and compact objects (probably neutron stars) in the mass gap (from 2.5M2.5 M_\odot or 3M3 M_\odot to 5M5 M_\odot) inferred from gravitational waves detected by LIGO/Virgo in the third observing run (O3), we reconsider the mass limits for compact stars in the present work. Without invoking strong magnetic field and/or exotic equation of state (EOS), we try to increase the mass limits for compact stars in modified gravity theory. In this work, we propose an inverse chameleon mechanism, and show that the fifth-force mediated by the scalar field can evade the severe tests on earth, in solar system and universe, but manifest itself in compact stars such as white dwarfs and neutron stars. The mass limits for compact stars in the inverse chameleon mechanism can be easily increased to 3M3 M_\odot\,, 5M5 M_\odot or even larger. We argue that the inverse chameleon mechanism might be constrained by the observations of exoplanets orbiting compact stars (such as white dwarfs and neutron stars), and gravitational waves from the last stage of binary compact star coalescence.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2103.12696,
  title  = {Inverse Chameleon Mechanism and Mass Limits for Compact Stars},
  author = {Hao Wei and Zhong-Xi Yu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12696},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

18 pages, 1 figure, revtex4; v2: discussions added, JCAP in press; v3: published version