English

Intrinsic Quantum Codes

Quantum Physics 2026-03-27 v2

Abstract

We introduce an intrinsic formulation of quantum error correction based on representation theory, in which error-protection structure is encoded directly in a unitary group representation, rather than being tied to a particular embedding into a larger Hilbert space. In this framework, error models are classified according to the isotypic decomposition of the conjugation action on the operator algebra. Our main result, the \emph{Schur bootstrap}, shows that if an intrinsic code satisfies the Knill--Laflamme conditions on a given symmetry sector, then the same error-protection relations hold for every extrinsic realization obtained from a group-equivariant isometric embedding into a larger Hilbert space. Thus a single intrinsic verification certifies the corresponding symmetry-resolved error-correction conditions across an entire family of physical realizations. We further introduce an intrinsic notion of distance, called depth, defined via adjoint order. For standard multi-qudit systems this coincides with conventional code distance, while for more general representations it refines the usual weight-based notion. We also prove an intrinsic Eastin--Knill theorem: any intrinsic code of depth at least two has a discrete logical symmetry group, with the obstruction to continuous covariant gates arising from the representation-theoretic structure of the adjoint action. We illustrate the framework with several examples, including a minimal SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2) construction that unifies permutation-invariant qubit codes and bosonic codes, and higher-dimensional constructions exhibiting transversal Clifford symmetries and realizations beyond qubit systems.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2511.14840,
  title  = {Intrinsic Quantum Codes},
  author = {Eric Kubischta and Ian Teixeira},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14840},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

More detail about intrinsic distance (depth). Prove an intrinsic Eastin--Knill theorem. New $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ and $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ constructions