English

Interpretable machine learning approach for electron antineutrino selection in a large liquid scintillator detector

Instrumentation and Detectors 2024-11-26 v2 Machine Learning High Energy Physics - Experiment Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability

Abstract

Several neutrino detectors, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the forthcoming large-scale JUNO, rely on liquid scintillator to detect reactor antineutrino interactions. In this context, inverse beta decay represents the golden channel for antineutrino detection, providing a pair of correlated events, thus a strong experimental signature to distinguish the signal from a variety of backgrounds. However, given the low cross-section of antineutrino interactions, the development of a powerful event selection algorithm becomes imperative to achieve effective discrimination between signal and backgrounds. In this study, we introduce a machine learning (ML) model to achieve this goal: a fully connected neural network as a powerful signal-background discriminator for a large liquid scintillator detector. We demonstrate, using the JUNO detector as an example, that, despite the already high efficiency of a cut-based approach, the presented ML model can further improve the overall event selection efficiency. Moreover, it allows for the retention of signal events at the detector edges that would otherwise be rejected because of the overwhelming amount of background events in that region. We also present the first interpretable analysis of the ML approach for event selection in reactor neutrino experiments. This method provides insights into the decision-making process of the model and offers valuable information for improving and updating traditional event selection approaches.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2406.12901,
  title  = {Interpretable machine learning approach for electron antineutrino selection in a large liquid scintillator detector},
  author = {A. Gavrikov and V. Cerrone and A. Serafini and R. Brugnera and A. Garfagnini and M. Grassi and B. Jelmini and L. Lastrucci and S. Aiello and G. Andronico and V. Antonelli and A. Barresi and D. Basilico and M. Beretta and A. Bergnoli and M. Borghesi and A. Brigatti and R. Bruno and A. Budano and B. Caccianiga and A. Cammi and R. Caruso and D. Chiesa and C. Clementi and S. Dusini and A. Fabbri and G. Felici and F. Ferraro and M. G. Giammarchi and N. Giudice and R. M. Guizzetti and N. Guardone and C. Landini and I. Lippi and S. Loffredo and L. Loi and P. Lombardi and C. Lombardo and F. Mantovani and S. M. Mari and A. Martini and L. Miramonti and M. Montuschi and M. Nastasi and D. Orestano and F. Ortica and A. Paoloni and E. Percalli and F. Petrucci and E. Previtali and G. Ranucci and A. C. Re and M. Redchuck and B. Ricci and A. Romani and P. Saggese and G. Sava and C. Sirignano and M. Sisti and L. Stanco and E. Stanescu Farilla and V. Strati and M. D. C. Torri and A. Triossi and C. Tuvé and C. Venettacci and G. Verde and L. Votano},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12901},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Phys. Lett. B. The final published version is available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269324006993

R2 v1 2026-06-28T17:10:50.484Z