English

Interplay of Zeeman field, Rashba spin-orbit interaction, and superconductivity: spin susceptibility

Superconductivity 2026-02-25 v2

Abstract

We present a self-consistent theory to calculate the static and uniform spin susceptibility in superconductors under simultaneous Zeeman magnetic fields and Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Employing a single-band Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian, we solve the gap equation for both conventional ss-wave spin-singlet and six representative pp-wave spin-triplet pairing states, categorized into opposite-spin-pairing (OSP) and equal-spin-pairing (ESP) classes. The Kubo formula, decomposed into intra- and interband particle-hole and particle-particle channels, provides two key constraints: at zero temperature, only particle-particle terms contribute, while at the critical temperature TcT_c, only particle-hole terms remain, ensuring χ(Tc)=χN\chi(T_c^{-}) = \chi_N for continuous phase transitions. For ss-wave pairing, a Zeeman field reduces TcT_c, whereas Rashba SOC preserves TcT_c but yields a residual zero temperature spin susceptibility χ(0)\chi(0) which approaches 2χN/32\chi_N/3 in the strong SOC limit; combined fields create a Bogoliubov Fermi surface, resulting in a kink in χ(0)\chi(0). In contrast, pp-wave states exhibit strong anisotropy: OSP states mimic spin-singlet pairing behavior for parallel Zeeman fields and ESP for transverse ones, while ESP states show the opposite, with Rashba SOC potentially changing the quasiparticle nodal structure, lowering TcT_c, or causing χzz(0)\chi_{zz}(0) divergences. This framework offers quantitative benchmarks for Knight-shift experiments in non-centrosymmetric superconductors like A2_2Cr3_3As3_3 (A = Na, K, Rb, and Cs), enabling diagnostics to disentangle pairing symmetry, SOC strength, and Zeeman effects.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.15056,
  title  = {Interplay of Zeeman field, Rashba spin-orbit interaction, and superconductivity: spin susceptibility},
  author = {Chen Pang and Yi Zhou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15056},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Published version