English

Informative Scene Graph Generation via Debiasing

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2024-11-21 v2

Abstract

Scene graph generation aims to detect visual relationship triplets, (subject, predicate, object). Due to biases in data, current models tend to predict common predicates, e.g. "on" and "at", instead of informative ones, e.g. "standing on" and "looking at". This tendency results in the loss of precise information and overall performance. If a model only uses "stone on road" rather than "stone blocking road" to describe an image, it may be a grave misunderstanding. We argue that this phenomenon is caused by two imbalances: semantic space level imbalance and training sample level imbalance. For this problem, we propose DB-SGG, an effective framework based on debiasing but not the conventional distribution fitting. It integrates two components: Semantic Debiasing (SD) and Balanced Predicate Learning (BPL), for these imbalances. SD utilizes a confusion matrix and a bipartite graph to construct predicate relationships. BPL adopts a random undersampling strategy and an ambiguity removing strategy to focus on informative predicates. Benefiting from the model-agnostic process, our method can be easily applied to SGG models and outperforms Transformer by 136.3%, 119.5%, and 122.6% on mR@20 at three SGG sub-tasks on the SGG-VG dataset. Our method is further verified on another complex SGG dataset (SGG-GQA) and two downstream tasks (sentence-to-graph retrieval and image captioning).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2308.05286,
  title  = {Informative Scene Graph Generation via Debiasing},
  author = {Lianli Gao and Xinyu Lyu and Yuyu Guo and Yuxuan Hu and Yuan-Fang Li and Lu Xu and Heng Tao Shen and Jingkuan Song},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05286},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

The author requests to withdraw this paper due to a critical definitional error in Informative Scene Graph Generation via Debiasing. This error aligned with the definition of Informative Scene Graph Generation tasks, resulting in an unfair comparison with state-of- the-art (SOTA) methods, which in turn, hindered the ability to evaluate the paper's contributions

R2 v1 2026-06-28T11:52:24.217Z