(Independent) Roman Domination Parameterized by Distance to Cluster
Abstract
Given a graph , a function is said to be a \emph{Roman Dominating function} (RDF) if for every with , there exists a vertex such that . A Roman Dominating function is said to be an \emph{Independent Roman Dominating function} (IRDF), if forms an independent set, where , for . The total weight of is equal to , and is denoted as . The \emph{Roman Domination Number} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination Number}) of , denoted by (resp. ), is defined as min is an RDF (resp. IRDF) of . For a given graph , the problem of computing (resp. ) is defined as the \emph{Roman Domination problem} (resp. \emph{Independent Roman Domination problem}). In this paper, we examine structural parameterizations of the (Independent) Roman Domination problem. We propose fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for the (Independent) Roman Domination problem in graphs that are vertices away from a cluster graph. These graphs have a set of vertices whose removal results in a cluster graph. We refer to as the distance to the cluster graph. Specifically, we prove the following results when parameterized by the deletion distance to cluster graphs: we can find the Roman Domination Number (and Independent Roman Domination Number) in time . In terms of lower bounds, we show that the Roman Domination number can not be computed in time , for any unless a well-known conjecture, SETH fails. In addition, we also show that the Roman Domination problem parameterized by distance to cluster, does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP coNPpoly.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2411.13141,
title = {(Independent) Roman Domination Parameterized by Distance to Cluster},
author = {Pradeesha Ashok and Gautam K. Das and Arti Pandey and Kaustav Paul and Subhabrata Paul},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13141},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2405.10556 by other authors