English

Inapproximability of the independent set polynomial in the complex plane

Computational Complexity 2026-02-04 v4 Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

We study the complexity of approximating the independent set polynomial ZG(λ)Z_G(\lambda) of a graph GG with maximum degree Δ\Delta when the activity λ\lambda is a complex number. This problem is already well understood when λ\lambda is real using connections to the Δ\Delta-regular tree TT. The key concept in that case is the "occupation ratio" of the tree TT. This ratio is the contribution to ZT(λ)Z_T(\lambda) from independent sets containing the root of the tree, divided by ZT(λ)Z_T(\lambda) itself. If λ\lambda is such that the occupation ratio converges to a limit, as the height of TT grows, then there is an FPTAS for approximating ZG(λ)Z_G(\lambda) on a graph GG with maximum degree Δ\Delta. Otherwise, the approximation problem is NP-hard. Unsurprisingly, the case where λ\lambda is complex is more challenging. Peters and Regts identified the complex values of λ\lambda for which the occupation ratio of the Δ\Delta-regular tree converges. These values carve a cardioid-shaped region ΛΔ\Lambda_\Delta in the complex plane. Motivated by the picture in the real case, they asked whether ΛΔ\Lambda_\Delta marks the true approximability threshold for general complex values λ\lambda. Our main result shows that for every λ\lambda outside of ΛΔ\Lambda_\Delta, the problem of approximating ZG(λ)Z_G(\lambda) on graphs GG with maximum degree at most Δ\Delta is indeed NP-hard. In fact, when λ\lambda is outside of ΛΔ\Lambda_\Delta and is not a positive real number, we give the stronger result that approximating ZG(λ)Z_G(\lambda) is actually #P-hard. If λ\lambda is a negative real number outside of ΛΔ\Lambda_\Delta, we show that it is #P-hard to even decide whether ZG(λ)>0Z_G(\lambda)>0, resolving in the affirmative a conjecture of Harvey, Srivastava and Vondrak. Our proof techniques are based around tools from complex analysis -- specifically the study of iterative multivariate rational maps.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1711.00282,
  title  = {Inapproximability of the independent set polynomial in the complex plane},
  author = {Ivona Bezakova and Andreas Galanis and Leslie Ann Goldberg and Daniel Stefankovic},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00282},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

The proof of Lemma 12 doesn't work as written here since the value returned by Phi_i in GetPoint (p17) may lie outside of B(z_0,r). See Lemma 5.3 of arXiv:2512.11504 by Bencs, Piombi, and Regts, where this is fixed via contraction over B(m,3r) (their modified Lemma can be used to establish Propositions 6 and 15, see Remark 5.4 of their paper). We thank them for pointing this out