English

Improved bounds on the postage stamp problem for large numbers of stamps

Combinatorics 2025-11-12 v2 Number Theory

Abstract

Let Fh(n)F_h(n) denote the minimum cardinality of an additive {\em hh-fold basis} of {1,2,,n}\{1,2,\cdots,n\}: a set SS such that any integer in {1,2,,n}\{1,2,\cdots, n\} can be written as a sum of at most hh elements from SS. While the trivial bounds h!n    Fh(n)h    hhnh!n \; \lesssim \; F_h(n)^h \; \lesssim \; h^h n are well-known, comparatively little has been established for h>2h>2. In this paper, we make significant improvements to both of the best-known bounds on Fh(n)F_h(n) for sufficiently large hh. For the lower bound, we use a probabilistic approach along with the Berry-Esseen Theorem to improve upon the best-known asymptotic result due to Yu. We also establish the first nontrivial asymptotic upper bound on Fh(n)F_h(n) by leveraging a construction for additive bases of finite cyclic groups due to Jia and Shen. In particular, we show that given any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, for sufficiently large hh, we have (12ϵ)h!2πen    Fh(n)h    ((32+ϵ)h)hn. \left(\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon\right)h!\sqrt{2\pi e} n\; \leq \; F_h(n)^h \; \leq \; \left(\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}+\epsilon\right)h\right)^h n.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2507.23627,
  title  = {Improved bounds on the postage stamp problem for large numbers of stamps},
  author = {Eric James Faust and Michael Tait},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.23627},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

There is a gap in the proof of the lower bound which we are working on fixing