English

Implications of the DLMA solution of $\theta_{12}$ for IceCube data using different astrophysical sources

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2023-08-24 v2

Abstract

In this paper, we study the implications of the Dark Large Mixing Angle (DLMA) solutions of θ12\theta_{12} in the context of the IceCube data. We study the consequences in the measurement of the neutrino oscillation parameters namely θ23\theta_{23} and δCP\delta_{\rm CP} in light of both Large Mixing Angle (LMA) and DLMA solutions of θ12\theta_{12}. We find that it will be impossible for IceCube to determine the δCP\delta_{\rm CP} and the true nature of θ12\theta_{12} i.e., LMA or DLMA at the same time. This is because of the existence of an intrinsic degeneracy at the Hamiltonian level between these parameters. Apart from that, we also identify a new degeneracy between θ23\theta_{23} and two solutions of θ12\theta_{12} for a fixed value of δCP\delta_{\rm CP}. We perform a chi-square fit using three different astrophysical sources, i.e., μ\mu source, π\pi source, and nn source to find that both μ\mu source and π\pi source are allowed within 1σ1 \sigma whereas the nn source is excluded at 2σ2 \sigma. It is difficult to make any conclusion regarding the measurement of θ23\theta_{23}, δCP\delta_{\rm CP} for μ\mu source. However, The π\pi (nn) source prefers higher (lower) octant of θ23\theta_{23} for both LMA and DLMA solution of θ12\theta_{12}. The best-fit value of δCP\delta_{\rm CP} is around 180180^\circ (0/3600^\circ/360^\circ) for LMA (DLMA) solution of θ12\theta_{12} whereas for DLMA (LMA) solution of θ12\theta_{12}, the best-fit value is around 0/3600^\circ/360^\circ (180180^\circ) for π\pi (nn) source. If we assume the current best-fit values of θ23\theta_{23} and δCP\delta_{\rm CP} to be true, then the μ\mu and π\pi source prefer the LMA solution of θ12\theta_{12} whereas the nn source prefers the DLMA solution of θ12\theta_{12}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2306.11653,
  title  = {Implications of the DLMA solution of $\theta_{12}$ for IceCube data using different astrophysical sources},
  author = {Monojit Ghosh and Srubabati Goswami and Supriya Pan and Bartol Pavlović},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11653},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

10 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables. Version accepted for publication in Universe