English

Implications of High Precision Experiments and the CDF Top Quark Candidates

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2008-11-26 v1

Abstract

We discuss the consequences of recent experimental results from CDF, SLC, LEP and elsewhere for the Standard Model and for new physics. A global fit to all indirect precision data yields mt=175±1119+17m_t = 175 \pm 11^{+17}_{-19}~GeV, sin2θMS=0.2317(3)(2)\sin^2\theta_{MS} = 0.2317(3)(2), and αs=0.127(5)(2)\alpha_s = 0.127(5)(2), where the central values are for MH=300M_H = 300 GeV and the second uncertainties are for MH1000M_H \rightarrow 1000 GeV (+) and 60 GeV (-). The mtm_t value is in remarkable agreement with the value mt=174±16m_t=174 \pm 16 GeV suggested by the CDF candidate events. There is a slight preference for a light Higgs with MH<730M_H < 730 (880) GeV at 95\% c.l. if the CDF mtm_t value is (not) included. The sensitivity is, however, due almost entirely to the anomalously large observed values for the ZbbˉZ \rightarrow b\bar{b} width and left-right asymmetry. The value of alpha_s (from the lineshape) is clean theoretically assuming the Standard Model, but is sensitive to the presence of new physics contributions to the ZbbˉZ \rightarrow b\bar{b} vertex. Allowing a vertex correction δbbˉnew\delta_{b\bar{b}}^{\rm new} one obtains the significantly lower value alpha_s = 0.111 \pm 0.009, in better agreement with low energy determinations, and δbbˉnew=0.023±0.011\delta_{b\bar{b}}^{\rm new} = 0.023 \pm 0.011. There is now enough data to perform more general fits to parameters describing new physics effects and to separate these from mtm_t and MHM_H. Allowing the parameter ρ0\rho_0, which describes sources of SU(2)SU(2) breaking beyond the Standard Model, to be free one finds ρ0=1.0012±0.0017±0.0017\rho_0=1.0012 \pm 0.0017 \pm 0.0017, remarkably close to unity. One can also separate the new physics contributions to the oblique parameters SnewS_{\rm new}, TnewT_{\rm new} and UnewU_{\rm new}, which all take values consistent with zero. The effects of supersymmetry on the determination of the SM parameters are discussed.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.hep-ph/9411203,
  title  = {Implications of High Precision Experiments and the CDF Top Quark Candidates},
  author = {Jens Erler and Paul Langacker},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:hep-ph/9411203},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

23 pages REVTeX + 3 figures (not included); complete postscript file available via anonymous ftp ftp://dept.physics.upenn.edu/pub/Langacker/statussmprep.ps