English

Impact of Redundancy on Resilience in Distributed Optimization and Learning

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing 2023-12-15 v2 Machine Learning

Abstract

This report considers the problem of resilient distributed optimization and stochastic learning in a server-based architecture. The system comprises a server and multiple agents, where each agent has its own local cost function. The agents collaborate with the server to find a minimum of the aggregate of the local cost functions. In the context of stochastic learning, the local cost of an agent is the loss function computed over the data at that agent. In this report, we consider this problem in a system wherein some of the agents may be Byzantine faulty and some of the agents may be slow (also called stragglers). In this setting, we investigate the conditions under which it is possible to obtain an "approximate" solution to the above problem. In particular, we introduce the notion of (f,r;ϵ)(f, r; \epsilon)-resilience to characterize how well the true solution is approximated in the presence of up to ff Byzantine faulty agents, and up to rr slow agents (or stragglers) -- smaller ϵ\epsilon represents a better approximation. We also introduce a measure named (f,r;ϵ)(f, r; \epsilon)-redundancy to characterize the redundancy in the cost functions of the agents. Greater redundancy allows for a better approximation when solving the problem of aggregate cost minimization. In this report, we constructively show (both theoretically and empirically) that (f,r;O(ϵ))(f, r; \mathcal{O}(\epsilon))-resilience can indeed be achieved in practice, given that the local cost functions are sufficiently redundant.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2211.08622,
  title  = {Impact of Redundancy on Resilience in Distributed Optimization and Learning},
  author = {Shuo Liu and Nirupam Gupta and Nitin H. Vaidya},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08622},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

49 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. Updated with the full version of the paper, updated results in Section 4 and Appendix C, and other minor fixings. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2110.10858

R2 v1 2026-06-28T06:00:17.449Z