English

Imbalance Learning for Variable Star Classification

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2020-03-18 v1 Machine Learning

Abstract

The accurate automated classification of variable stars into their respective sub-types is difficult. Machine learning based solutions often fall foul of the imbalanced learning problem, which causes poor generalisation performance in practice, especially on rare variable star sub-types. In previous work, we attempted to overcome such deficiencies via the development of a hierarchical machine learning classifier. This 'algorithm-level' approach to tackling imbalance, yielded promising results on Catalina Real-Time Survey (CRTS) data, outperforming the binary and multi-class classification schemes previously applied in this area. In this work, we attempt to further improve hierarchical classification performance by applying 'data-level' approaches to directly augment the training data so that they better describe under-represented classes. We apply and report results for three data augmentation methods in particular: R\textit{R}andomly A\textit{A}ugmented S\textit{S}ampled L\textit{L}ight curves from magnitude E\textit{E}rror (RASLE\texttt{RASLE}), augmenting light curves with Gaussian Process modelling (GpFit\texttt{GpFit}) and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE\texttt{SMOTE}). When combining the 'algorithm-level' (i.e. the hierarchical scheme) together with the 'data-level' approach, we further improve variable star classification accuracy by 1-4%\%. We found that a higher classification rate is obtained when using GpFit\texttt{GpFit} in the hierarchical model. Further improvement of the metric scores requires a better standard set of correctly identified variable stars and, perhaps enhanced features are needed.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2002.12386,
  title  = {Imbalance Learning for Variable Star Classification},
  author = {Zafiirah Hosenie and Robert Lyon and Benjamin Stappers and Arrykrishna Mootoovaloo and Vanessa McBride},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.12386},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

11 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication in MNRAS