IIKL: Isometric Immersion Kernel Learning with Riemannian Manifold for Geometric Preservation
Abstract
Geometric representation learning in preserving the intrinsic geometric and topological properties for discrete non-Euclidean data is crucial in scientific applications. Previous research generally mapped non-Euclidean discrete data into Euclidean space during representation learning, which may lead to the loss of some critical geometric information. In this paper, we propose a novel Isometric Immersion Kernel Learning (IIKL) method to build Riemannian manifold and isometrically induce Riemannian metric from discrete non-Euclidean data. We prove that Isometric immersion is equivalent to the kernel function in the tangent bundle on the manifold, which explicitly guarantees the invariance of the inner product between vectors in the arbitrary tangent space throughout the learning process, thus maintaining the geometric structure of the original data. Moreover, a novel parameterized learning model based on IIKL is introduced, and an alternating training method for this model is derived using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), ensuring efficient convergence. Experimental results proved that using the learned Riemannian manifold and its metric, our model preserved the intrinsic geometric representation of data in both 3D and high-dimensional datasets successfully, and significantly improved the accuracy of downstream tasks, such as data reconstruction and classification. It is showed that our method could reduce the inner product invariant loss by more than 90% compared to state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, also achieved an average 40% improvement in downstream reconstruction accuracy and a 90% reduction in error for geometric metrics involving isometric and conformal.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2505.06288,
title = {IIKL: Isometric Immersion Kernel Learning with Riemannian Manifold for Geometric Preservation},
author = {Zihao Chen and Wenyong Wang and Jiachen Yang and Yu Xiang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06288},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
We decided to withdraw this submission because we identified a statistical issue in the experimental section. Specifically, for seven methods (LLE, MLLE, LTSA, Spectral, CAMEL, PaCMAP, and UMAP) on the CIC-IDS2018 dataset, a spreadsheet printing/mixing error caused the reduction-rate results in Table 5 to appear identical