English

Hyperbolic volume estimates via train tracks

Geometric Topology 2017-05-11 v2

Abstract

In this thesis we describe how to estimate the distance spanned in the pants graph by a train track splitting sequence on a surface, up to multiplicative and additive constants. If some moderate assumptions on a splitting sequence are satisfied, each vertex set of a train track in it will represent a vertex of a graph which is naturally quasi-isometric to the pants graph; moreover the splitting sequence gives an edge-path in this graph so, more precisely, our distance estimate holds between the extreme points of this path. The present distance estimate is inspired by a result of Masur, Mosher and Schleimer for distances in the marking graph. However, we can apply their line of proof only after some manipulation of the splitting sequence: a rearrangement, changing the order the elementary moves are performed in, so that the ones producing Dehn twists are brought together; and then an untwisting, which suppresses the majority of these latter moves to give a new sequence, which does not end with the same track as before, but does not include any portion that is almost stationary in the pants graph. The required distance is then, up to constants, the number of splits occurring in the untwisted sequence. A consequence of our main theorem together with a result of Brock is that, given a pseudo-Anosov self-diffeomorphism ψ\psi of a surface SS, the maximal splitting sequence introduced by Agol gives us an estimate for the hyperbolic volume of the mapping torus built from SS and ψ\psi. There are also some interesting consequences for the hyperbolic volume of a solid torus minus a closed braid, via a machinery employed by Dynnikov and Wiest.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1609.09672,
  title  = {Hyperbolic volume estimates via train tracks},
  author = {Antonio De Capua},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09672},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

DPhil thesis; final version submitted to the University of Oxford after implementation of the requested minor corrections. Many errors and oversights have been corrected, with particular reference to subsurface projections and definitions related with twist curves; the first Lemma in {\S} 2.5.2 has been removed and its usage replaced with different arguments. Other points have been clarified

R2 v1 2026-06-22T16:06:28.743Z