English

Hydrogen Emission from Accretion and Outflow in T Tauri Stars

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2022-06-01 v1

Abstract

Radiative transfer modelling offers a powerful tool for understanding the enigmatic hydrogen emission lines from T Tauri stars. This work compares optical and near-IR spectroscopy of 29 T Tauri stars with our grid of synthetic line profiles. The archival spectra, obtained with VLT's X-Shooter, provide simultaneous coverage of many optical and infrared hydrogen lines. The observations exhibit similar morphologies of line profiles seen in other studies. We used the radiative transfer code TORUS to create synthetic Hα\alpha, Paβ\beta, Paγ\gamma, and Brγ\gamma emission lines for a fiducial T Tauri model that included axisymmetric magnetospheric accretion and a polar stellar wind. The distribution of Reipurth types and line widths for the synthetic Hα\alpha lines is similar to the observed results. However, the modelled infrared lines are narrower than the observations by 80 kms1\approx 80{~\rm kms}^{-1}, and our models predict a significantly higher proportion (90\approx 90 per cent) of inverse P-Cygni profiles. Furthermore, our radiative transfer models suggest that the frequency of P-Cygni profiles depends on the ratio of the mass loss to mass accretion rates and blue-shifted sub-continuum absorption was predicted for mass loss rates as low as 1012 M yr110^{-12}~M_{\odot}{\rm~ yr}^{-1}. We explore the effect of rotation, turbulence, and the contributions from red-shifted absorption in an attempt to explain the discrepancy in widths. Our findings show that, singularly, none of these effects is sufficient to explain the observed disparity. However, a combination of rotation, turbulence, and non-axisymmetric accretion may improve the fit of the models to the observed data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2205.08523,
  title  = {Hydrogen Emission from Accretion and Outflow in T Tauri Stars},
  author = {Tom J. G. Wilson and S. Matt and T. J. Harries and G. J. Herczeg},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08523},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Main Journal