How to obtain the redshift distribution from probabilistic redshift estimates
Abstract
A trustworthy estimate of the redshift distribution is crucial for using weak gravitational lensing and large-scale structure of galaxy catalogs to study cosmology. Spectroscopic redshifts for the dim and numerous galaxies of next-generation weak-lensing surveys are expected to be unavailable, making photometric redshift (photo-) probability density functions (PDFs) the next-best alternative for comprehensively encapsulating the nontrivial systematics affecting photo- point estimation. The established stacked estimator of avoids reducing photo- PDFs to point estimates but yields a systematically biased estimate of that worsens with decreasing signal-to-noise, the very regime where photo- PDFs are most necessary. We introduce Cosmological Hierarchical Inference with Probabilistic Photometric Redshifts (CHIPPR), a statistically rigorous probabilistic graphical model of redshift-dependent photometry, which correctly propagates the redshift uncertainty information beyond the best-fit estimator of produced by traditional procedures and is provably the only self-consistent way to recover from photo- PDFs. We present the prototype code, noting that the mathematically justifiable approach incurs computational expense. The CHIPPR approach is applicable to any one-point statistic of any random variable, provided the prior probability density used to produce the posteriors is explicitly known; if the prior is implicit, as may be the case for popular photo- techniques, then the resulting posterior PDFs cannot be used for scientific inference. We therefore recommend that the photo- community focus on developing methodologies that enable the recovery of photo- likelihoods with support over all redshifts, either directly or via a known prior probability density.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2007.12178,
title = {How to obtain the redshift distribution from probabilistic redshift estimates},
author = {Alex I. Malz and David W. Hogg},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12178},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
submitted to ApJ